MCA Fines Company and Directors for Loan Violation Under Section 180

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has recently taken strict action against a company and its directors for borrowing funds beyond the legally allowed limits without proper approval. In a significant ruling passed by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, the company and its responsible directors were slapped with a penalty of ₹3.5 lakhs.

The violation? The company had failed to comply with the borrowing restrictions under Section 180(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. Let’s break down what this section means, what the company did wrong, and the consequences that followed.

Understanding Section 180(1)(c): What Does the Law Say?

Section 180 of the Companies Act, 2013 lists powers that a company’s Board of Directors can exercise only with the consent of the shareholders via a special resolution passed at a general meeting.

Specifically, Section 180(1)(c) restricts the Board from borrowing money in excess of:

• The company’s paid-up share capital,
• Free reserves, and
• Securities premium account,

…unless approved by a special resolution passed by the shareholders.

This provision ensures that directors do not take on excessive debt without involving the company’s owners — the shareholders.

What Happened in the Case of M/s BCL Homes?

In this particular case, the company M/s BCL Homes exceeded its permissible borrowing limit without obtaining the required shareholder approval through a special resolution.

This was considered a direct violation of Section 180(1)(c). As a result, the Registrar of Companies initiated adjudication proceedings under Section 454, which allows the RoC to impose penalties for violations of the Companies Act.

After evaluating the case, the RoC concluded that both the company and its directors were liable. A total fine of ₹3.5 lakhs was imposed, shared among the company and its officers in default.

Why This Penalty Matters

This ruling sends a clear message: corporate governance and compliance are non-negotiable.

Whether intentional or due to oversight, breaching legal borrowing limits reflects poor internal control and lack of legal awareness, both of which are unacceptable under current corporate laws.

Key Compliance Lessons for Companies

1. Monitor Borrowings Closely: Companies must regularly check whether their total borrowings stay within the limits prescribed by Section 180(1)(c).
2. Obtain Shareholder Approval When Needed: If additional borrowing is required, always get a special resolution approved in a general meeting before proceeding.
3. Conduct Internal Compliance Reviews: Periodic audits by legal professionals can help identify and rectify potential compliance gaps before they lead to penalties.
4. Directors Are Personally Responsible: Directors cannot escape liability by claiming ignorance. They are accountable for decisions taken under their watch.
5. Adjudication is Real and Active: Section 454 is actively being used by MCA to penalize violations — so don’t expect leniency.

FAQs – Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. What is a special resolution?

A special resolution is a decision passed by shareholders requiring at least 75% of voting members in favor. It is necessary for decisions like borrowing beyond Section 180 limits.

Q2. Can private companies also be penalized under Section 180(1)(c)?

Yes, both public and private companies are required to follow this provision unless specifically exempted.

Q3. What happens if a company borrows beyond the allowed limit without approval?

The company and its directors may face financial penalties, reputational damage, and legal proceedings under the Companies Act.

Q4. Who imposes the penalty under Section 454?

The Registrar of Companies (RoC) is empowered to adjudicate and impose penalties for certain violations under the Companies Act, including Section 180 breaches.

Q5. Can the penalty be appealed?

Yes, the order can be challenged before the Regional Director (RD) within 60 days from the date of the order.

Conclusion

The penalty imposed on M/s BCL Homes and its directors is a strong reminder of the importance of compliance in corporate finance. Borrowing decisions that ignore shareholder authority not only risk financial instability but also invite legal trouble.

For directors and corporate professionals, understanding the limits set by Section 180(1)(c) is essential. Ignorance is not an excuse under the law. With the MCA actively enforcing these provisions, it’s time for companies to revisit their borrowing practices and ensure that every financial move is legally backed and transparently recorded.

📢 Need help with corporate compliance or legal advisory?
Connect with our experts to ensure your company stays on the right side of the law.

📞 Contact Us: Chhavi Goyal
🌐 Website: https://cschhavigoyal.com/contact-us/

📅 Published on: 06 May 2025
✍️ Author: CS Chhavi Goyal